Hawk Servers



More forum "ranks"

#1
(This post was last modified: 08-01-2019, 10:52 PM by Z4.)

Who is this suggestion targeted at? (i.e rank.. jobs..)
>> Forum users

What is your main suggestion(provide links if possible)
>> Adding more "ranks", in which shows if they're respected/trusted. * Names could be "Credible" or "Established" or maybe two different tiers of this trust.*

How would your suggestion improve the server?
>> So i feel it will improve staff apps, for example i always see people making staff apps while they're mates are + repping just because. I feel it help higher ups who need to review and accept/deny staff apps. These ranks could be handed out by higher-ups or a voting system implemented ( could be a whole different app or when a player reaches a certain amount of +reps on the forums ).  Only allowing these people and staff to reply on staff apps may help to show a more trusted opinion which isnt biased and make sure the selected staff is the best they can be.
[img=0x0]https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/372827066728448002/533364054383656972/Forum_sig.png[/img]
Reply

#2

+ rep

Would need to be tweaked slightly maybe but I like the idea of having the 'TRUSTED' and 'VETERAN' as forum tags. This can easily show what kind of replies on staff apps are more trustworthy.
Got the big oof...
Reply

#3

+/-Rep
Could be easily farmed if its just by hours. But if it was posts then I see no issue
-Gamer Grill
Reply

#4

Can you propose any names for the ranks?
[Image: UsWPhQ9.png]
Reply

#5
(This post was last modified: 08-01-2019, 10:51 PM by Z4.)

(08-01-2019, 10:36 PM)Exhility Wrote: Can you propose any names for the ranks?

Maybe "Established"  or "Credible".  Or 2 different tiers of it so maybe use both of em TongueP? 

(08-01-2019, 09:56 PM)Soap-Chan Wrote: +/-Rep
Could be easily farmed if its just by hours. But if it was  posts then I see no issue
Ah i mean like account reps rather than post reps :pp xddd
[img=0x0]https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/372827066728448002/533364054383656972/Forum_sig.png[/img]
Reply

#6

Only staff will be able to comment on staff applications soon, which makes this kinda pointless - though I do see why it's good in your opinion.

I doubt Tasid will agree to this, the current "rank" non-donors get is "Registered", the rank allows the user to basically use the forums. More ranks will only make this more difficult, but we'll see.
Reply

#7

(08-01-2019, 11:04 PM)the ultimate sheryiff Wrote: Only staff will be able to comment on staff applications soon, which makes this kinda pointless - though I do see why it's good in your opinion.

I doubt Tasid will agree to this, the current "rank" non-donors get is "Registered", the rank allows the user to basically use the forums. More ranks will only make this more difficult, but we'll see.
Ah right, But i can see it being useful on more controversial suggestions. I do agree though it may be to much effort for little outcome, but it may just help you higher ups on determining an overall judgement. :Tongue <333
[img=0x0]https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/372827066728448002/533364054383656972/Forum_sig.png[/img]
Reply

#8

-rep
It is quite pointless imo, will only make tasid have to make two extra ranks and set them up completely. I would leave it just as it is, especially, as Kai says, because only staff will be able to post on staff apps shortly
[Image: Tiw4CuO.jpg]
Reply

#9

-rep Usually, +reps by friends/clan members are often ignored (or they should be) since they will always be biased even if they try not to be.
A
Reply

#10

-rep
I mean the idea isnt necessarily bad, it's just not really needed and extra work for tasid.
[Image: jif.gif]
Reply





Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)